It’s been a refreshing past two weeks in the media. The tonal change in the North American papers ever since Obama’s
Whatever may his reasons be, we definitely owe Obama this one. ‘He needs the goodwill of the Muslim world for economic stability,’ says one analyst while another points out that ‘he wouldn't be addressing the Christian world, or the Jewish, Hindu or Buddhist worlds so why the exception for Muslims?’
For my part, the heck with such pontification! He came, he spoke, he conquered and he definitely left a lot of goodwill in his wake. But he was bound to. With charisma oozing out from every facet of his personality; knowing the art of oration to the last effective pause and above all, with the vast team to work for him (which reportedly was grammatically analyzing and evaluating every syllable in his speech for its combined effect from Jerusalem to Tehran to Washington!), success was bound to be his. One die-hard Republican almost sneered at me and commented, “Obama should stop giving speeches as if he’s still campaigning!”
What would be amusing if it wasn’t so distressing is the sudden eruption of newly established opinions of many latter day news analysts on television and in print. Ever since Obama has taken up the Palestine-Israel conflict as a major foreign policy issue it has become the urgent business of the newer breed of reporters to educate themselves on the conflict. But when you are living in an environment where the Holocaust is the most-repeated historic fact and where only Israel’s ‘beleagured residents’ can be seen being ‘fired upon with rockets by those terrorists Hammas,’ it eclipses the predicament of the Palestinian refugees unable to return home, living under siege with no supply of food and who are made to look like petulant but dangerous delinquents. The easiest argument becomes the anti-Semitic chant which the neo-analysts allege is the same as anti-Zionism which the Palestinian and other Muslims are using to persecute Jews. The western media really needs a few home truths and some history lessons to be shown.
One thing is there though, that Obama has proven himself undaunted by disagreeable consequences of his decisions. While his sangfroid to the rather pithy backlash from Conservatives at home following his salaams to the Muslim world is one case in point, his take on the closing of
Four Muslim Uighur detainees from a group of seventeen – ranging in age from 30 to 38 – were sent to Bermuda after UK and Canada refused to keep them and when proposals to resettle them in the United States ended in a political furor. The Uighurs’ background is rather heart-rending. They were a group of men which had fled Chinese persecution of Muslims in western
When a litany of accusations was created for all
Now, after seven years of life in the
Reports of their release and landing in Bermuda were reported in detail in Canadian papers particularly because
The Toronto Star’s National Security Reporter, Michelle Sheppard, who met and spent the day with them on their island retreat, gave a touching account of their reactions. She wrote, “After almost eight years of captivity, each step of Khelil Mehmut's freedom is a little overwhelming… People call him by his name, not 278, his internee serial number… they seemed insulated in their ocean-side pink cottage, enjoying a fish lunch, a sunset swim and fielding the occasional media call,” (not to mention getting accustomed to the bikini clad damsels who roam the resort island!).
What with the turning sentiments against Muslims and now this miraculous change of circumstances for condemned individuals, I have become a believer again that justice will be done; it just takes its own time coming!
*************************
"For my part, the heck with such pontification! He came, he spoke, he conquered... With charisma oozing out from every facet of his personality..."
ReplyDeleteI know someone who was using such epithets for President Musharraf after his Agra Summit, and until he dismissed the Chief Justice when he became, simply, "the commando in Islamabad"... ;)